<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://timeslaughingstocks.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Beyond_World_Class_-_Mfg_Strategy</id>
	<title>Beyond World Class - Mfg Strategy - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://timeslaughingstocks.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Beyond_World_Class_-_Mfg_Strategy"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://timeslaughingstocks.com/index.php?title=Beyond_World_Class_-_Mfg_Strategy&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T08:48:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.4</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://timeslaughingstocks.com/index.php?title=Beyond_World_Class_-_Mfg_Strategy&amp;diff=380&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Paulreed: Created page with &quot;1. Copying Best Practices is not a substitute for Strategy 2. Companies view 3 letter acronyns as solutions rather than stepping stones and look at their mechanics and not their ...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://timeslaughingstocks.com/index.php?title=Beyond_World_Class_-_Mfg_Strategy&amp;diff=380&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2010-12-27T16:04:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;1. Copying Best Practices is not a substitute for Strategy 2. Companies view 3 letter acronyns as solutions rather than stepping stones and look at their mechanics and not their ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;1. Copying Best Practices is not a substitute for Strategy&lt;br /&gt;
2. Companies view 3 letter acronyns as solutions rather than stepping stones and look at their mechanics and not their substance - i.e. learning to do things that other companies cannot&lt;br /&gt;
3. Strategic flexibility is an objective&lt;br /&gt;
4. Strategic Fit according to Skinner is Company&amp;#039;s mfg system should equal its competitive strategy&lt;br /&gt;
5. Are trade off really necessary - Japanese companies have achieved both - [[Lean Manufacturing]] avoided the wastes that compromise flexibility&lt;br /&gt;
6. Does flexibility negate the need for [[The Focus Factory]]&lt;br /&gt;
7. Is strategic fit less important than strategic flexibility e.g. Sony Walkman&lt;br /&gt;
8. Is speed and flexibility more important than cost and volume&lt;br /&gt;
9. What does the market want innovation or low cost or both and do they change?&lt;br /&gt;
10.Focussed approach says difficult tasks become routine and it can take on more flexibility&lt;br /&gt;
11. Learning bringing in house some capabilitiy that it oes not know very well may be less learn but builds learning and capabilities that the company needs for the future&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Strategy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Paulreed</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>