Divisional Performance Measurement: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


For Example
For Example
*Sales...........................900
{|
*less VC.........................400
|-Sales|900
*CONTRIBUTION+...................500...''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)''
|-less VC|400
*less controllable FC............100
|-CONTRIBUTION+|500|''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)''
*CONTROLLABLE PROFIT.............400...''(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation)''
|-less controllable FC|100
*less Non-controllable FC........100
|-CONTROLLABLE PROFIT|400|''(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation)''
*DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's.....300...''(Good measure of Division's economic performance)''
|-less Non-controllable FC|100
*Corp Exp.........................100...'(Arbitrary allocation)
|-DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's|300|''(Good measure of Division's economic performance)''
*DIV NET PROFIT...................200...''(Good measure of comparison with peer companies)''
|-Corp Exp|100|''(Arbitrary allocation)''
|-DIV NET PROFIT|200|''(Good measure of comparison with peer companies)''
\}


See [[Divisionalization]]
See [[Divisionalization]]

Revision as of 08:10, 9 February 2011

A Divisional perfoamnce measurement could look like this:

For Example

\} See Divisionalization See Residual Income