Divisional Performance Measurement: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
For Example
For Example
{|
{|
|-Sales|900
Sales|900
|-less VC|400
|-
|-CONTRIBUTION+|500|''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)''
less VC|400
|-less controllable FC|100
|-
|-CONTROLLABLE PROFIT|400|''(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation)''
CONTRIBUTION+|500|''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)''
|-less Non-controllable FC|100
|-
|-DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's|300|''(Good measure of Division's economic performance)''
less controllable FC|100
|-Corp Exp|100|''(Arbitrary allocation)''
|-
|-DIV NET PROFIT|200|''(Good measure of comparison with peer companies)''
CONTROLLABLE PROFIT|400|''(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation)''
|-
less Non-controllable FC|100
|-
DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's|300|''(Good measure of Division's economic performance)''
|-
Corp Exp|100|''(Arbitrary allocation)''
|-
DIV NET PROFIT|200|''(Good measure of comparison with peer companies)''
|}
|}



Revision as of 08:12, 9 February 2011

A Divisional perfoamnce measurement could look like this:

For Example

Sales|900 less VC|400 CONTRIBUTION+|500|(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC) less controllable FC|100 CONTROLLABLE PROFIT|400|(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation) less Non-controllable FC|100 DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's|300|(Good measure of Division's economic performance) Corp Exp|100|(Arbitrary allocation) DIV NET PROFIT|200|(Good measure of comparison with peer companies)

See Divisionalization See Residual Income