Modern: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Commentary== | ==Commentary== | ||
I found myself eventually warming to Modernism having always equated it with post-war, unimaginative, poorly built New Towns like Crawley or the Brutalist visions of Erno Goldfinger [Trellick Tower, London]. | I found myself eventually warming to Modernism having always equated it with post-war, unimaginative, poorly built New Towns like Crawley or the [[Brutalist]] visions of Erno Goldfinger [Trellick Tower, London]. | ||
[[File:Trellick_tower.jpg|thumb| Tellick Tower]] | [[File:Trellick_tower.jpg|thumb| Tellick Tower]] | ||
Where Modernism succeeds is when its architecture expresses its function in a plain, form-follows-function rational, unadorned fashion bereft of any unnecessary cutural, religious or political symbolism. The United Nations building fits that rationale. One can see that this is an International building that owes little to the antecedents of any one country. It also looks to the future not the past. | Where Modernism succeeds is when its architecture expresses its function in a plain, form-follows-function rational, unadorned fashion bereft of any unnecessary cutural, religious or political symbolism. The United Nations building fits that rationale. One can see that this is an International building that owes little to the antecedents of any one country. It also looks to the future not the past. | ||
[[File:UN_building.jpg|left|thumb| UN Building]] | [[File:UN_building.jpg|left|thumb| UN Building]] | ||
It is also 'honest' where there is no disguise of the engineering that went into the building. There is no implied strength where none exists or design feature where not needed. It avoids the pastiche or conceit that goes into the building of something that (although well meaning) pretends to be something it is not [e.g. Podium Shopping Center - Bath] | It is also 'honest' where there is no disguise of the engineering that went into the building. There is no implied strength where none exists or design feature where not needed. It avoids the pastiche or conceit that goes into the building of something that (although well meaning) pretends to be something it is not [e.g. Podium Shopping Center - Bath] | ||
[[File:Podium_shopping_center.jpg|thumb| Podium Shopping Center]] | [[File:Podium_shopping_center.jpg|thumb| Podium Shopping Center]] | ||
Modernism can also be innovative and dramatic like Niemeyer's Brasilia Cathedral or Peutz's Glass Palace [Netherlands 1935], which looks very contemporary. | Modernism can also be innovative and dramatic like Niemeyer's Brasilia Cathedral or Peutz's Glass Palace [Netherlands 1935], which looks very contemporary. | ||
Revision as of 14:46, 31 December 2010
Commentary
I found myself eventually warming to Modernism having always equated it with post-war, unimaginative, poorly built New Towns like Crawley or the Brutalist visions of Erno Goldfinger [Trellick Tower, London].
Where Modernism succeeds is when its architecture expresses its function in a plain, form-follows-function rational, unadorned fashion bereft of any unnecessary cutural, religious or political symbolism. The United Nations building fits that rationale. One can see that this is an International building that owes little to the antecedents of any one country. It also looks to the future not the past.
It is also 'honest' where there is no disguise of the engineering that went into the building. There is no implied strength where none exists or design feature where not needed. It avoids the pastiche or conceit that goes into the building of something that (although well meaning) pretends to be something it is not [e.g. Podium Shopping Center - Bath]
Modernism can also be innovative and dramatic like Niemeyer's Brasilia Cathedral or Peutz's Glass Palace [Netherlands 1935], which looks very contemporary.
