Divisional Performance Measurement: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{| | {| | ||
|Sales|| | |Sales|900 | ||
|} | |||
|- | |- | ||
less VC | less VC|400 | ||
|- | |- | ||
CONTRIBUTION+|500|''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)'' | CONTRIBUTION+|500|''(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC)'' | ||
Revision as of 08:20, 9 February 2011
A Divisional perfoamnce measurement could look like this:
For Example
| 900 |
|- less VC|400 |- CONTRIBUTION+|500|(note:no good for management performance measurement because Mgr can control FC) |- less controllable FC|100 |- CONTROLLABLE PROFIT|400|(Good for Mgr performance measurement unless it's a profit center they have no control over depreciation) |- less Non-controllable FC|100 |- DIV PROFIT Before Corp Exp's|300|(Good measure of Division's economic performance) |- Corp Exp|100|(Arbitrary allocation) |- DIV NET PROFIT|200|(Good measure of comparison with peer companies) |}
See Divisionalization See Residual Income