Continuous Change: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Continuous Improvement - Challenge the status quo Continuous Learning - updating knowledge base Continuous Adaptation - open change receptive cultures Change as a discontinuous ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
e.g. Budget airlines has forced Major airlines to cut costs by 50% per seat | e.g. Budget airlines has forced Major airlines to cut costs by 50% per seat | ||
Sabena went bankrupt | Sabena went bankrupt because the Mckinsey strategy was too high risk and there wasnt the financial stability to underpin it | ||
Things can go badly wrong then co's change their architecture | Things can go badly wrong then co's change their architecture | ||
Latest revision as of 20:43, 21 December 2010
Continuous Improvement - Challenge the status quo Continuous Learning - updating knowledge base Continuous Adaptation - open change receptive cultures
Change as a discontinuous process
Occaisonally a real or imaginary crisis can jolt an organisation - bursts of activity followed by consolidation
e.g. Budget airlines has forced Major airlines to cut costs by 50% per seat
Sabena went bankrupt because the Mckinsey strategy was too high risk and there wasnt the financial stability to underpin it
Things can go badly wrong then co's change their architecture
Opacity - limited foresight in to how different units in an organization are interconnected Asperity - An organizational culture that wont accept change
