M&A Issue: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "See Impirical Evidence on M&A,M&A 1. Anti-Trust - Concentration can lead to monopolies. Co's will often have to see off parts of the company that they buy 2. Cross-border...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
See [[Impirical Evidence on M&A]],[[M&A]]
See [[Impirical Evidence on M&A]] and[[M&A]]
1. Anti-Trust - Concentration can lead to monopolies. Co's will often have to see off parts of the company that they buy
*1. Anti-Trust - Concentration can lead to monopolies. Co's will often have to see off parts of the company that they buy
2. Cross-border aquisitions. M&S bought Brooks Bros. GrandMet bought Burger King. BP bought Amoco. Nestle bought Rowntree
*2. Cross-border aquisitions. M&S bought Brooks Bros. GrandMet bought Burger King. BP bought Amoco. Nestle bought Rowntree
3. What are the pesonal motives of the CEO's buying the companies
*3. What are the pesonal motives of the CEO's buying the companies
4. Defender tactics. White Knight buys a share, Company Revalues assets, Sell off an valuable part of the business to avoid t/o
*4. Defender tactics. White Knight buys a share, Company Revalues assets, Sell off an valuable part of the business to avoid t/o


[[Category:Strategy]]
[[Category:Strategy]]

Latest revision as of 17:12, 15 January 2012

See Impirical Evidence on M&A andM&A

  • 1. Anti-Trust - Concentration can lead to monopolies. Co's will often have to see off parts of the company that they buy
  • 2. Cross-border aquisitions. M&S bought Brooks Bros. GrandMet bought Burger King. BP bought Amoco. Nestle bought Rowntree
  • 3. What are the pesonal motives of the CEO's buying the companies
  • 4. Defender tactics. White Knight buys a share, Company Revalues assets, Sell off an valuable part of the business to avoid t/o