Capital Rationing: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Introduction==
*'''Soft Rationing''' - Internal limit on capital expenditure
*'''Soft Rationing''' - Internal limit on capital expenditure
*'''Hard capital Rationing''' - Imposed by financial organization
*'''Hard capital Rationing''' - Imposed by financial organization
Line 5: Line 6:


eg Take the PV (not netted by the initial investment) and divide it by the investment, so if PV = 3.25 and Investment was 2.5 then the profitability index is 1.3. Do that for all projects and undertaken all the projects up to the capital limit. NPV can be used and this will not affect the rankings.
eg Take the PV (not netted by the initial investment) and divide it by the investment, so if PV = 3.25 and Investment was 2.5 then the profitability index is 1.3. Do that for all projects and undertaken all the projects up to the capital limit. NPV can be used and this will not affect the rankings.
==Capital Rationing Decisions==
Normally, using NPV all projects with a positive NPV should be undertaken and if two projects are mutually exclusive
we choose the one with the highest positive NPV. However, in practice
there may often be insufficient funds available to undertake all viable
project and without external financing the amount that can be invested is limited to the
available retained profits plus the unused borrowing capacity. Similar
restrictions apply to larger companies and subsidiaries or divisions of
large groups. Share issues take time to set up, are costly and may be
unpopular (especially discounted rights issues) and if a company is
already highly geared it may be difficult to raise additional debt to
finance long-term projects. It is not uncommon for divisional
managers to be told that they have to ‘compete’ for the limited funds
that Group can make available. Consequently divisional managers not
only need to be able to apply investment appraisal techniques to their
prospective projects competently, they must also be good at
presenting their projects and ‘winning’ the funds from Group.
Capital rationing adds an extra complication to investment appraisal
as we must reject viable projects due to lack of funds and find a way
to determine the combination of projects that will maximise the firm’s
NPV within the constraint on capital. Simply ranking projects in terms
of absolute NPV is not effective as we must consider the size of the NPV
in relation to the capital invested. If projects are independent and
divisible we simply use the profitability index to rank projects and


==Limitations==
==Limitations==

Revision as of 09:37, 31 August 2012

Introduction

  • Soft Rationing - Internal limit on capital expenditure
  • Hard capital Rationing - Imposed by financial organization

Ranking NPV projects based upon profitability index is one way to maximize the capital

eg Take the PV (not netted by the initial investment) and divide it by the investment, so if PV = 3.25 and Investment was 2.5 then the profitability index is 1.3. Do that for all projects and undertaken all the projects up to the capital limit. NPV can be used and this will not affect the rankings.

Capital Rationing Decisions

Normally, using NPV all projects with a positive NPV should be undertaken and if two projects are mutually exclusive we choose the one with the highest positive NPV. However, in practice there may often be insufficient funds available to undertake all viable project and without external financing the amount that can be invested is limited to the available retained profits plus the unused borrowing capacity. Similar restrictions apply to larger companies and subsidiaries or divisions of large groups. Share issues take time to set up, are costly and may be unpopular (especially discounted rights issues) and if a company is already highly geared it may be difficult to raise additional debt to finance long-term projects. It is not uncommon for divisional managers to be told that they have to ‘compete’ for the limited funds that Group can make available. Consequently divisional managers not only need to be able to apply investment appraisal techniques to their prospective projects competently, they must also be good at presenting their projects and ‘winning’ the funds from Group. Capital rationing adds an extra complication to investment appraisal as we must reject viable projects due to lack of funds and find a way to determine the combination of projects that will maximise the firm’s NPV within the constraint on capital. Simply ranking projects in terms of absolute NPV is not effective as we must consider the size of the NPV in relation to the capital invested. If projects are independent and divisible we simply use the profitability index to rank projects and

Limitations

  • Projects do not all start at the same time so it is difficult to identify a specific capital amount.
  • The NPV's may have differing income streams and risks
  • If the investment outlays are above the capital limit you may have to undertake only part of the project if that is feasible or the number of whole projects that most closely utilizes the capital. See NPV

If there are mutually exclusive projects, for instance you cannot do E if you do C then pursue the projects based upon the profitability index up to the Capital Rationing limit. There all combinations should be tried to determine the best combination. However, the combination must exactly equal the capital rationing limit.