Strategic Intent: Difference between revisions
From MediaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "Seen as going beyond Business as Usual Seen as Core Competency in Practice For instance Sony Honda strategic intent was global dominance. Compare with Strategic Fit ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Seen as [[Core Competency in Practice]] For instance Sony [[Honda]] strategic intent was global dominance. Compare with [[Strategic Fit]] which doesn't have a long term component. Basically they used their core competences to achieve Strategic Intent. The difference between Intent and Resources is call [[Strategic Stretch]]. | Seen as [[Core Competency in Practice]] For instance Sony [[Honda]] strategic intent was global dominance. Compare with [[Strategic Fit]] which doesn't have a long term component. Basically they used their core competences to achieve Strategic Intent. The difference between Intent and Resources is call [[Strategic Stretch]]. | ||
See also [http://www3.uma.pt/filipejmsousa/ge/Hamel%20and%20Prahalad,%201989.pdf| Strategtic Intent] | |||
From [[Prahalad and Hamel]] | From [[Prahalad and Hamel]] | ||
[[Category:Strategy]] | [[Category:Strategy]] | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 23 September 2012
Seen as going beyond Business as Usual
Seen as Core Competency in Practice For instance Sony Honda strategic intent was global dominance. Compare with Strategic Fit which doesn't have a long term component. Basically they used their core competences to achieve Strategic Intent. The difference between Intent and Resources is call Strategic Stretch.
See also Strategtic Intent
From Prahalad and Hamel
